Explore a Live Engagement
This is what a governed analytics engagement looks like end-to-end. Select an industry to walk through real findings, board reports, and governance workflows.
Reliability Score
81
33 → 81(+48 pts)
Is our reported fee revenue of $1.2M accurate?
BayesIQ's audit surfaced 3 findings and enabled targeted remediation that improved the reliability score from 33 to 81.
P&L showed $299K in fee revenue — actual is $274K. $25K phantom revenue on regulatory filings constitutes a material misstatement
Reported
299,461
fee revenue · 2025-12
Audited
274,383
Overstated 8.4%
Decision Exposure
P&L showed $299K in fee revenue — actual is $274K. $25K phantom revenue on regulatory filings constitutes a material misstatement
54 near-duplicate rows detected (identical on all fields except key columns). This suggests duplicate ingestion or recording.
BayesIQ Data Reliability Audit
Fintech
Audit Period: December 2025
Reliability Score
Good — some issues need attention
Illustrative example — representative of BayesIQ audit deliverables
BayesIQ audits a fintech company's transaction fee revenue pipeline across merchant reconciliation, fee calculations, and regulatory reporting. The audit identifies 3 findings — including 54 near-duplicate transaction records, null merchant IDs breaking downstream aggregations, and an 8.4% fee revenue overstatement constituting a material misstatement. After remediation, the reliability score improves from 33 to 81.
Key Metrics: Reported vs Audited
| Metric | Period | Reported | Audited | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| fee_revenue | 2025-12 | 299,461 | 274,383 | overstated 8.4% |
Top Findings
fee_revenue misreported for 2025-12 (off by +8.4%)
P&L showed $299K in fee revenue — actual is $274K. $25K phantom revenue on regulatory filings constitutes a material misstatement
Near-duplicate rows detected
54 duplicate transaction records inflating fee calculations and distorting merchant reconciliation
54 rows affected
Null values in required column: merchant_id
28 transactions missing merchant_id — cannot reconcile these fees to merchants or verify compliance
28 rows affected
Recommended Actions
- 1
Investigate duplicate records. Add dedup logic keyed on non-key fields.
Owner: Data Engineering|Effort: Mediumhigh - 2
Fix null values in required column 'merchant_id' at the source.
Owner: Data Engineering|Effort: Mediumhigh - 3
Investigate root cause of fee_revenue discrepancy for 2025-12. Check for duplicate events, missing data, or filter logic differences.
Owner: Data Engineering|Effort: Smallmedium
Deliverables
Book a Fintech Data Diagnostic
A focused $7,500 engagement. We audit your fintech data, score your metrics, and deliver a remediation roadmap in 2 weeks.
Book a diagnosticMonthly Metric Reliability Program
Ongoing monitoring, governed corrections, and executive-ready reporting. Starting at $2,500/month.
Learn more